This website uses cookies
Read our Privacy policy and Terms of use for more information.
Judgment
+1
Sep 16, 2026
•
4 min read
Human-first drafting can preserve independent engagement before AI enters the workflow. It cannot, by itself, establish where the final judgment came from.
+2
Sep 9, 2026
3 min read
Completeness is a virtue in prose and a position in a legal instrument. The tool cannot tell the two apart.
Aug 27, 2026
An assessment can become stale without ever having been wrong.
Aug 21, 2026
A court just identified the half of AI review that human verification does not reach.
Aug 10, 2026
Every edit was justified. The paragraph was built around the wrong point.
Benchmarks
+3
Jul 30, 2026
Human review matters. It is also being asked to prove things it cannot establish.
Confidentiality
Jul 19, 2026
Once the tool can read files, send messages, and call outside services, the unit of confidentiality risk is no longer the prompt. It is the access.
Jul 14, 2026
Rating a Claude or ChatGPT answer feels like grading the tool. On Anthropic's commercial products, that click is permission to keep the whole conversation and train on it. On OpenAI's, it depends on which product you are in and a setting most lawyers have never seen. The same click can be a disclosure decision - and the client was never asked.
Jul 9, 2026
5 min read
An AI vendor's copy of a client trade secret, held under confidentiality terms, does not lose the secret. What loses it is an obligation that expires while the copy lives on, or a copy you cannot require the vendor to delete.
Jun 30, 2026
Every enterprise AI tier promises not to train on your data. None of them promises not to keep it. Lawyers are treating the first as if it were the second.
Jun 23, 2026
You can delete your chat history. You cannot delete the copy the provider kept - and that copy, while it lasts, is the one legal process can reach.
Jun 18, 2026
Everyone is reading United States v. Heppner as the case where a chatbot destroyed attorney-client protection. Read it beside a quieter ruling from the same weeks that came out the other way, and the real lesson is one lawyers already knew.
Jun 16, 2026
There is no single answer to what the tool does with your inputs. The terms depend on how you reach the model and which one you pick - and they changed three times while you were not looking.
Jun 13, 2026
What the Fable shutdown actually teaches lawyers - and it is not the thing everyone is arguing about.
Jun 10, 2026
2 min read
Competence is shifting from "is the output correct" to "can you show where your judgment took control." A short record closes most of the gap.
Jun 9, 2026
For IP and patent lawyers especially, "redact the client's name" is not a confidentiality strategy. It barely touches the risk.
Jun 8, 2026
The AI mistakes that get pro se litigants mocked are happening inside expert legal work too. They are just better dressed, which is what makes them dangerous.
Jun 7, 2026
Why legal competence now requires lawyers to preserve friction, not just verify outputs.
