This website uses cookies
Read our Privacy policy and Terms of use for more information.
Aug 27, 2026
An assessment can become stale without ever having been wrong.
Aug 21, 2026
A court just identified the half of AI review that human verification does not reach.
Aug 10, 2026
Every edit was justified. The paragraph was built around the wrong point.
Aug 3, 2026
How a benchmark can stay accurate while becoming misleading.
Jul 30, 2026
Human review matters. It is also being asked to prove things it cannot establish.
Jul 19, 2026
Once the tool can read files, send messages, and call outside services, the unit of confidentiality risk is no longer the prompt. It is the access.
Jul 14, 2026
Rating a Claude or ChatGPT answer feels like grading the tool. On Anthropic's commercial products, that click is permission to keep the whole conversation and train on it. On OpenAI's, it depends on which product you are in and a setting most lawyers have never seen. The same click can be a disclosure decision - and the client was never asked.
Jul 9, 2026
An AI vendor's copy of a client trade secret, held under confidentiality terms, does not lose the secret. What loses it is an obligation that expires while the copy lives on, or a copy you cannot require the vendor to delete.
Jun 30, 2026
Every enterprise AI tier promises not to train on your data. None of them promises not to keep it. Lawyers are treating the first as if it were the second.
Jun 23, 2026
You can delete your chat history. You cannot delete the copy the provider kept - and that copy, while it lasts, is the one legal process can reach.